what do you guys make of this?
http://www.propagandamatrix.com/articles/october2008/100208_northcom_denies.htm
Pretty intense stuff. I did not realise they had repealed Bushes changes. Interesting how he does not "recognize" the changes.
Now if this is true.
For troops to be deployed, a condition has to exist that, "(1) So hinders the execution of the laws of that State, and of the United States within the State, that any part or class of its people is deprived of a right, privilege, immunity, or protection named in the Constitution and secured by law, and the constituted authorities of that State are unable, fail, or refuse to protect that right, privilege, or immunity, or to give that protection; or (2) opposes or obstructs the execution of the laws of the United States or impedes the course of justice under those laws. In any situation covered by clause (1), the State shall be considered to have denied the equal protection of the laws secured by the Constitution."
How come they haven't sent the troops into DC and California to protect our 2A rights, which have nearly been stripped?