I was thinking about it earlier and agree that such can't be, effectively, policed in any kind of coherent or consistent manner.
I wonder, however, what Liberals hope to gain from placing such restrictions on that type of fare. Normally, it's Conservatives who get up in arms over it. Libertarians don't much care and most folks don't even recognize its existence in town and, if they do, they simply steer clear.
In this State, it's not 'paranoia' to wonder what the motivation
ACTUALLY is when the Left starts pushing this kind of thing. More to the point, what is their intended use? Could it simply be a 'distraction' from the budget deficit or should we expect to start hearing about the supposed connection between porn, guns, and 'terrorists?' We saw it a couple of years ago in West Virginia. . .
On guns, Governor Justice focuses on porn, profanity, social media, video games, mental health -
https://wvmetronews.com/2022/05/31/on-guns-governor-justice-focuses-on-porn-profanity-social-media-video-games-mental-health/We've even heard it from Republicans in 2018 -
Tennessee Republican suggests porn to blame for gun violence -
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/tennessee-republican-suggests-porn-to-blame-for-gun-violence/Back in 2011, one author mused. . .
https://www.thepublicdiscourse.com/2011/08/3651/I wonder whether the pornography of today - now ubiquitous and increasingly grotesque - is one of the influences warping the mentality of those who aspire to or who actually go on to engage in ever more grotesque public violence.
National security? Could this be another brick in the facade Newsom supposedly isn't building in terms of his 'national presence' with an eye toward higher office?
In other words, whether you'd like to see it 'gone' from the public square or not, when the free love and nickel beer progeny begin banging the gong, it doesn't hurt to start looking around to see if there are other 'warning signs' as to where they might be headed.
Then again, such concerns could simply be a neurotic disorder engendered from living in State where such can be and has been another means by which they claim 'legitimacy' in separating you from your guns with an eye toward 'public safety.' Right?
