Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
I apparently started this thread several years ago but have no recollection of doing so. I don't remember the reason or the pointless point and why did I start with the number 17?
what currently is happening, for the last few years, yes. 10 years ago, no. in the past far enough when Obama was POTUS, i never thought it was going to get this bad.
the far left run most of the institutions. media, Hollywood, schools, cities, etc.
Where the fluck is pepper spray guy when you need him.
Is this some sort of joke or are you dumb as hell?
"Simply assume less profit"
Oh gee, what a great idea. Why don't they just assume less profit? Gosh, they are so greedy and mean. The government should force them to lower their prices.
I always ask those who demand businesses to make less money if they would take a pay cut. The answer is always NO. Strange, asking others to sacrifice while never be generous themselves.
Yes, I would accept less under certain circumstances. Poor economic conditions where all businesses are struggling to stay afloat. As opposed to laid off due to necessary cuts. Many have done this in the past. Im not demanding that they lower prices. Only that if the loss of their customer base becomes severe enough they may have to, inconceivable as it may be to them.
Your argument would make sense if labor already took a pay cut due to tough economic conditions and now you ask the business to cut prices. However, in this case, the tough economic conditions are brought on by labor getting a bigger share of the pie. The stupid law disrupted market equilibrium. Labor should make the sacrifice by giving back this ill-gotten gain to restore customer confidence. Businesses did nothing wrong.
Yes. They did nothing wrong. The government created the situation. There is nothing they can do about it. If they lose enough customers, they will be forced toreduce pricesgo out of business. Theyhopefully willunderstand this.
Because the dining price difference gap has significantly narrowed after the $20/hr. mandate.
"Shane Paul, who runs seven Jack in the Box locations in San Diego, has already adjusted his pricing strategy.
He revealed that they have raised their prices about 10% or 11% over the past six to 12 months, marking a significant shift from his usual annual increases of 3.5% to 4%.
Following these price adjustments, Paul has noticed a concerning trend: Transactions at his restaurants are already
LMAO!! It totally cut off my response. Just to repeat, Assume the average 3% profit margin for restaurants, that is $30 for every $1,000 in sales. Where is all this extra money you speak of?
Because the dining price difference gap has significantly narrowed after the $20/hr. mandate.
"Shane Paul, who runs seven Jack in the Box locations in San Diego, has already adjusted his pricing strategy.
He revealed that they have raised their prices about 10% or 11% over the past six to 12 months, marking a significant shift from his usual annual increases of 3.5% to 4%.
Following these price adjustments, Paul has noticed a concerning trend: Transactions at his restaurants are already
This is NOT bad!
But I smote thee for reminding me of LBD's two boobs.
)
I just got to say, I'm not a common slowpoke. I am a extraordinary slowpoke. I certainly don't want to be lumped in with you common ones.
It was three years ago and it was a play on words...
Ya had to be there
If you were extraordinary, you would have been
)
